• WisPolitics


Monday, July 13, 2009

 12:38 PM 

'New Democrat' Kind has role in national health care reform

Western Wisconsin Congressman Ron Kind may not be a household name in health care policy. But as efforts to overhaul the nation's health care system move toward a climax this summer, sources inside and outside Congress say the moderate Democrat has quietly carved out a notable role.

Kind has co-sponsored two pieces of legislation that have a shot at being incorporated in whatever final version of health care reform is considered this year in Congress.

Kind told WisPolitics.com a bipartisan approach, rather than legislation that adheres to only the views of Democrats, works best.

"I still believe that Congress functions best when it works in a bipartisan fashion," he said. "That comes from listening."

One bill (H.R. 2502) addresses "comparative effectiveness" research -- that is, studies that compare various medical treatments in hopes of finding out which ones work most effectively and which ones should be discouraged. The measure Kind supports would establish an independent comparative effectiveness research trust fund and a board with 21 stakeholder representatives, including those from the medical profession and patients' groups, to oversee such research.

Backers of the bill see it, in part, as a way of rebutting claims by some Republicans that comparative effectiveness research -- which received $1.1 billion in this year's economic stimulus package -- is a slippery slope leading to bureaucrats deciding how a patient's ailments should be treated.

Supporters of H.R. 2502 say comparative effectiveness research is vital to the nation's future health care system -- as long as safeguards are provided.

The second bill Kind is supporting -- the Small Business Health Options Program, or SHOP, Act (H.R. 2360) -- would encourage small businesses and self-employed individuals to band together in a statewide or nationwide pool to obtain lower health insurance prices. It would also provide small business owners with a tax credit for sharing the cost of their employees' health care premiums, among other provisions.

The SHOP Act has attracted supporters ranging across the ideological spectrum, including such business groups as the National Federation of Independent Business, the National Association of Realtors and the National Restaurant Association, and such labor and liberal groups as the Service Employees International Union, Families USA and the National Partnership for Women and Families.

While Kind hardly has the clout of such key figures as Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., or House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the seven-term Wisconsin lawmaker has influence for two distinct reasons.

Kind is a member of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health, which is tasked with helping write a preliminary House version of health care legislation. However, because Kind is a junior member of that subpanel, it's arguably more important that Kind is a vice-chair of the New Democrat Coalition, a group of several dozen Democrats who have moderate-to-liberal views on domestic policy but who also maintain good ties to business.

The New Democrats -- the ideological heirs of the Democratic Leadership Coalition, which helped shape Bill Clinton's centrist approach when he first ran for president -- "are a significant group that the speaker and the key committee chairs will need to work closely with as they prepare a final bill," said Ron Pollack, the executive director of Families USA and a veteran of years of congressional skirmishing over health care policy. "The New Democrats have clearly wanted to make a mark on this legislation, and they undoubtedly will."

Robert Moffit, director of the center for health policy studies at the conservative Heritage Foundation, agreed that House moderates will play a role in whatever health care legislation emerges from Congress, even if conventional wisdom is correct in suggesting the Senate -- where lawmakers must meet a 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster -- will ultimately shape the bill more directly.

Moffit noted that a chunk of New Democrats, along with members of the somewhat more conservative Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, will likely provide the House Democratic leadership with the votes they'll need to pass health legislation. And if the recent 219-212 vote on cap-and-trade energy legislation is any indication, the House margin on a health care bill will likely be narrow.

"It's not so much that the House's decisions are decisive, but if you pass a bill by a close margin in the House, it strengthens the hand of moderate Democrats in the Senate," Moffit said. "If you pass the House bill by a one-vote majority, that says to moderate Democrats in the Senate that they have a real shot at shaping the final outcome."

Kind, in an interview, said the New Democrats place a high priority on overhauling the delivery system for health care. He noted the group's past efforts to advance the spread of health information technology, which received a major boost in the economic stimulus bill.

"We're for changing the incentives and reimbursements, rewarding value, not volume," Kind said. "Based on studies, there's incredible over-utilization. Thirty cents of every dollar spent on care and treatment doesn't improve patient health. That's where you go to find the savings that make wider coverage possible."

The SHOP Act provides an example of the approach Kind prefers. The bill grew out of efforts long promoted by the NFIB to allow "association health plans" -- the ability of trade and professional groups to offer their members health care plans across state lines, as corporations and unions already may do.

Despite years of aggressive lobbying by the influential small business group, it eventually became clear the legislation as written couldn't win passage. So NFIB and its allies decided to broaden their alliance by crafting what is now the SHOP Act.

The payoff from that rewrite was the support of groups like SEIU and Families USA -- and of lawmakers like Kind, who had gone so far as to sponsor alternative legislation to NFIB's association health plans bill in a previous Congress.

"On health care, Congressman Kind is a critical and welcome addition to the small-employer community," said Michelle Dimarob, NFIB's manager of legislative affairs for the House. "He does a very good job representing the needs of small business owners in affording and offering health insurance."

Observers say Kind's sensitivity to such issues stems from his Eau Claire- and La Crosse-based 3rd Congressional District, which is heavy with small businesses and small farms and for a long time was represented by GOP moderate Steve Gunderson.

La Crosse is also home to the Gundersen Lutheran Health System, which has shown interest in comparative effectiveness.

In general, Wisconsin and its lawmakers have taken an outsized role in health care policy this year. President Obama recently traveled to the perennial swing area of Green Bay to hold a health care town hall meeting, in part because studies have shown that some of the state's health systems rank high compared to the rest of the nation in controlling costs and improving patient outcomes. And two other members of the Wisconsin congressional delegation have been active on the issue -- Democratic Rep. Steve Kagen, himself a physician, and House Budget ranking GOP member Paul Ryan, who has focused attention on the price tag of overhauling the health care system.

Health care activists who have worked with Kind in Wisconsin give him high marks. Health policy is clearly "an issue that is near and dear to his heart," said Lisa Lamkins, advocacy director of AARP Wisconsin.

Robert Kraig, of the liberal group Citizen Action Wisconsin, said his group has worked extensively with Kind, including efforts to secure his support on a public option within health care reform -- a stance that separates most liberal Democrats from moderate Democrats.

"We haven't taken an official stance" on the comparative effectiveness bill or the SHOP Act, Kraig said. "But we think what he's trying to do is excellent. He's engaged and hopes to bring together a high-quality deal."

Kind also has a reputation as something of a maverick. His efforts, so far unsuccessful, to eliminate farm subsidies "have perplexed people in agriculture because dairy subsidies matter so much to his district," said Jerry Hagstrom, the ex-president of the North American Agricultural Journalists and an agriculture reporter for CongressDaily.

But Tony Coelho -- the former House Democratic whip who now chairs the Partnership to Improve Patient Care, a prime backer of the comparative effectiveness bill -- sees him as a staunch partner. "To have someone like Ron, who is considered an up-and-comer, is very significant," he said. "The New Democrats are a group of younger, aggressive members. They intend to be around for a while and want to be effective in Congress."

Members of Coelho's group run the gamut from major health care industry players (the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Biotechnology Industry Organization) to medical specialty societies (cardiology, gastroenterology, urology) to patient advocacy groups (for autism, epilepsy, mental illness) and even a conservative legal group (the Washington Legal Foundation).

"We are supporters of comparative effectiveness research," Coelho said. "We just want to make sure it's done right. We don't want the government dictating to patients and doctors what kind of health care we should have. But we want the research done and to make sure that patients and doctors have it."

Michael F. Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, is skeptical.

"Generally speaking, whatever Congress tries to do on comparative effectiveness research is either useless or fails," Cannon said. "The reason it fails is that useful research poses a threat to the incomes of special interests. ... The government has proven it's not capable of producing a steady stream of useful research because politics always ends up winning the day."

However the health care debate plays out, some wonder whether Kind, 44, and his New Democrat colleagues will increase their clout in years to come, as the "old guard" of Democratic leaders exits the stage.

"Are the New Democrats truly a new generation of Democrats?" asked Alec Vachon, a former Republican congressional aide and an independent health care policy analyst in Washington. "As the senior guys peel off, are they going to have a different perspective, closer to that of moderate Republicans?"

In the meantime, it appears Kind will be a player in the ultimate answer to those questions.

- Louis Jacobson


Back to DC Wrap main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

DC Wrap site feed


Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

WisPolitics coverage of news from the nation's capital.

BLOG CONTRIBUTORS
JR Ross, David Wise

· DC Wrap site feed (RSS)

· Sign up for email delivery of the weekly DC Wrap column

CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION

SENATE
· Tammy Baldwin (D)
· Ron Johnson (R)

HOUSE
· 1st CD: Paul Ryan (R)
· 2nd CD: Mark Pocan (D)
· 3rd CD: Ron Kind (D)
· 4th CD: Gwen Moore (D)
· 5th CD: F. James Sensenbrenner (R)
· 6th CD: Glenn Grothman (R)
· 7th CD: Sean Duffy (R)
· 8th CD: Reid Ribble (R)

CONGRESSIONAL VOTE TRACKING

WISPOLITICS.COM D.C. PROFILES

· July 2013: Wood's 2001 DC inauguration trip turned into new career
· May 2013: Hard work propels Berens from Doyle to Pelosi to DGA
· March 2013: Riemann uses PR skills, 'lunch-pail work ethic' to boost state interests in D.C.
· Feb. 2013: Stocks seeks to remake NEA as 'more than a traditional labor union'
· Dec. 2012: As modest Kohl bids farewell to Senate, others do the bragging
· Dec. 2012: Wisconsin experience provides guideposts to Priebus at RNC

ARCHIVE

· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications