• WisPolitics


Thursday, March 17, 2016

 8:52 AM 

Wendy Riemann column: Advantageous Advocacy: Refrain from talk of political contributions


On an average day, a government leader, as well as their staff, might meet with a Fortune 500 CEO, a disabled child, an environmental group, a local mayor, a business group from their district, and others.

They hear a lot of messages on many different issues from various constituents.

As constituents begin each meeting, some make a fairly common, but costly, mistake. It is one of the biggest DON'Ts in terms of getting positive results for a cause. In fact, in some offices, it can completely backfire and get a constituent less help, not more.

What is this taboo?

Mentioning a political campaign contribution, and in some cases, a political association.

An elected official wears two hats - the official hat and the campaign hat. Despite what may be portrayed on political TV shows or in the movies, both sides generally stay in their lanes. When taking a meeting in a legislator's Capitol office, that is on the official side, which means there should be NO mention of political contributions. NONE.

If a constituent has a relevant or pressing issue, good staff people will listen and see if they can help, regardless of a political contribution or affiliation.

In surveying dozens of Hill staff, I found the vast majority are completely turned off (read: "disgusted," "appalled," and "insulted" - their words) when someone mentions a political contribution in a government meeting. It sends the signal that this person either thinks the staff can be easily bought or that the staff was not professional enough to help unless the "skids were greased." Offending a staff person is never a good start to a meeting.

While Capitol Hill does not have open records, in offices that do, sending something in email to a staff person that mentions being a donor or a member of a political organization is one of the surest ways to not get the desired assistance. In a couple of previous positions, I occasionally received these types of emails, and, when I did, I would often politely call the person and tell them, "I'm sorry, but I work on the government side and since you mentioned the political side, I now need to direct you to the campaign."

Had they not included those inappropriate political words, I would have gladly been able to help them.


Bottom line: it is not all about the Benjamins. Forget "show me the money." When in an official office, keep the discussion to official business.

-- Riemann is president of 1492 Communications, a consulting firm. She can be reached at: wendy@1492communications.com.


Back to DC Wrap main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

DC Wrap site feed


Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

WisPolitics coverage of news from the nation's capital.

BLOG CONTRIBUTORS
JR Ross, David Wise

· DC Wrap site feed (RSS)

· Sign up for email delivery of the weekly DC Wrap column

CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION

SENATE
· Tammy Baldwin (D)
· Ron Johnson (R)

HOUSE
· 1st CD: Paul Ryan (R)
· 2nd CD: Mark Pocan (D)
· 3rd CD: Ron Kind (D)
· 4th CD: Gwen Moore (D)
· 5th CD: F. James Sensenbrenner (R)
· 6th CD: Glenn Grothman (R)
· 7th CD: Sean Duffy (R)
· 8th CD: Reid Ribble (R)

CONGRESSIONAL VOTE TRACKING

WISPOLITICS.COM D.C. PROFILES

· July 2013: Wood's 2001 DC inauguration trip turned into new career
· May 2013: Hard work propels Berens from Doyle to Pelosi to DGA
· March 2013: Riemann uses PR skills, 'lunch-pail work ethic' to boost state interests in D.C.
· Feb. 2013: Stocks seeks to remake NEA as 'more than a traditional labor union'
· Dec. 2012: As modest Kohl bids farewell to Senate, others do the bragging
· Dec. 2012: Wisconsin experience provides guideposts to Priebus at RNC

ARCHIVE

· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications