• WisPolitics


Thursday, June 9, 2016

 10:31 AM 

Wendy Riemann column: Advantageous Advocacy: Developing deeper, more meaningful relationships

The word “networking” has always bothered me. Living in Washington, D.C., networking often seems more like sport. It is aggressive, full-contact, and people want the W. At many receptions, I have often thought it should be called “net-gaming,” because so many people treat it like an athletic competition.

It is a running joke in the DC area that the first question people ask someone new is “What do you do?” so they can decide if it is even worth learning their name, or move on to the next person they are already noticing over the first person’s shoulder.

Far too many individuals are focused on the instant reward, how fast they can work a room, and the number of business cards they can acquire at an event. Yes, there is something to life being a numbers game, especially in a big city where even knowing someone slightly can help place a resume in front of the right person. However, what is often overlooked in the networking game is actually developing some of that network into a genuine relationship – yes, a real friend – someone who is trustworthy, genuine, and giving.

A good egg is a good egg, regardless of his title or job. In the age of virtual relationships, that real relationship can mean far more, both personally and professionally.

Think more Vanguard, less Pay Day Loan. A person wants to invest in another person, wants for that investment to grow, and would even take it paying back dividends at some point. Note the order of that: giving, growing, possible return.

In my opinion, it is often the relationships with depth and substance that will go further in the long run,. A network connection can get a resume into the right hands. A person with a deeper relationship can get the resume into the right hands AND put in a solid reference.

Some Capitol Hill staffers like it when groups come in to talk without always wanting something during their visit. However, several more staff advise people not to overdo the meet-and-greets; they simply don't have the time to chat. The pace of their jobs requires them to be more in the network mode of gathering business cards. So amidst the hustle and bustle, how can that relationship develop?

This goes back to giving without expectation of a return. Advocacy is not a done-in-a-day project. It often is void of instant gratification. Relationships stem from all sorts of different situations. They take time to grow and the necessary methods can, and should, vary widely.

Do a Hill meeting and/or meet-and- greet. Next, instead of popping in every month to say “hi” and gain face time (several staff suggested no more than 2-4 meetings a year if there was nothing pressing), add some value to the staff member’s day. For instance, follow-up after a meeting with an email or short phone call referencing something from the earlier conversation. Send a relevant article or useful study to that staff person with a short note on why it is valuable to them. Visit the official at a town hall meeting. Be the reliable resource that they need.

However, do not just say, “I’m here to be a resource for you.” If I had a quarter for every time I heard that from a group, I would be retired. Staff do not have time to call around and guess which “resource” might have what they need (often because they are worried they will be pulled down a rabbit hole on something else while other items are urgent). Take it a step further by quickly and specifically stating resources you have and ways it is applicable to them. For instance, “I hear that trucking legislation is headed for committee or the floor in short order – we have a one-pager on the positive impacts of that bill to our community if it is helpful.” Or, “I know this is not the issue we just discussed, but I noticed that legislation X is moving. We did a study of our members – all whom live in your district – which found it could really negatively impact employment. If that would interest you, I could send it.” Needs are now going both ways and a relationship is born!

Anyone who has flown knows that a person is supposed to secure his oxygen mask before assisting others. But in the world of advocacy, it is often better to assist the other person first.

-- Riemann is president of 1492 Communications, a consulting firm. She can be reached at: wendy@1492communications.com.


Back to DC Wrap main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

DC Wrap site feed


Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

WisPolitics coverage of news from the nation's capital.

BLOG CONTRIBUTORS
JR Ross, David Wise

· DC Wrap site feed (RSS)

· Sign up for email delivery of the weekly DC Wrap column

CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION

SENATE
· Tammy Baldwin (D)
· Ron Johnson (R)

HOUSE
· 1st CD: Paul Ryan (R)
· 2nd CD: Mark Pocan (D)
· 3rd CD: Ron Kind (D)
· 4th CD: Gwen Moore (D)
· 5th CD: F. James Sensenbrenner (R)
· 6th CD: Glenn Grothman (R)
· 7th CD: Sean Duffy (R)
· 8th CD: Reid Ribble (R)

CONGRESSIONAL VOTE TRACKING

WISPOLITICS.COM D.C. PROFILES

· July 2013: Wood's 2001 DC inauguration trip turned into new career
· May 2013: Hard work propels Berens from Doyle to Pelosi to DGA
· March 2013: Riemann uses PR skills, 'lunch-pail work ethic' to boost state interests in D.C.
· Feb. 2013: Stocks seeks to remake NEA as 'more than a traditional labor union'
· Dec. 2012: As modest Kohl bids farewell to Senate, others do the bragging
· Dec. 2012: Wisconsin experience provides guideposts to Priebus at RNC

ARCHIVE

· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· June 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· September 2016
· October 2016
· November 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications